The success of a vision of the future requires to some degree accuracy of it, as in for instance Orwell's 1984, Huxley's Brave New World, Skinner's Walden Two, or Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land. Because of this approximation, these books achieve startling and profound poignancy. The Turner Diaries fails at this painfully and embarrassingly, its analysis of human nature being questionable. It misses the mark. The idea of the Organization and the revolution is possible, but the way the events play out is simply absurd. The story poses more questions than it resolves, the tell-tale mark of confusion. The Cohen Act; the repeal of the 2nd amendment; the overzealous liberal agenda of political correctness, in short, fascism; the concentrated power of an elite, in this case it is the Jews, through control of the military, the media, and government agencies are all quite conceivable, however preposterous. The logical extension, though, of a race war that becomes nuclear and leads to world domination by the white race is exceptionally baffling, as ridiculous as Charles Manson's confounding belief in Helter Skelter. To divvy up the world along race lines seems silly, and today would be impossible. Human nature is so much more than color.
Revolution always makes for compelling narrative. Be it violent or pacifist, a fight between the System and the Organization, or the people and the state, is always happening. It all depends on where you stand, how you look at it, from what angle, what prospective, with what agenda.... Still, a book, be it pure fiction, must have a foundation. And to some degree the story must be sound. That is why The Turner Diaries will stick around only as a curiosity, an amusement, an historical artifact, a silly plaything.
No comments:
Post a Comment